I hear that women in general only made 80 cents for every dollar a man makes, while doing the exact same job the man does.

I have a great idea, I'm going to start my own company. I'm going to hire nothing but women. That will give me a 20 percent labor advantage over all my competition. I'm also told I will make even more money if I only hire women of color.

It is all so simple, why has no one thought of this before?

Is it maybe because greedy, evil, capitalist businessman, don't really want to make a lot of money?

Or is what we hear about woman being under paid, when they are just as qualified as a men doing the same job is all bullshit?

If religious faith causes suicide why is it that atheists are far more suicidal that those of faith?

"Concerning suicide rates, this is the one indicator of societal health in which religious nations fare much better than secular nations. According to the 2003 World Health Organization's report on international male suicides rates (which compared 100 countries), of the top ten nations with the highest male suicide rates, all but one (Sri Lanka) are strongly irreligious nations with high levels of atheism. It is interesting to note, however, that of the top remaining nine nations leading the world in male suicide rates, all are former Soviet/Communist nations, such as Belarus, Ukraine, and Latvia. Of the bottom ten nations with the lowest male suicide rates, all are highly religious nations with statistically insignificant levels of organic atheism."

"Religious affiliation is associated with less suicidal behavior in depressed inpatients"

If living in a christian nation causes suicide among homosexuals. Then why is there a higher attempted suicide rate of young homosexuals in the worlds most atheists nations, than in the evil very religious USA?

European Sexual Minority Suicidality Studies

It seems in the real world, not the made up straw man world of some the true is

Suicide by the Faithless.

It is not beyond reason to believe that the human personality comes about largely by way of genetics. A gene that indicates extreme aggression and violent behavior has already been found. Many believe that they will find that homosexuals are born that way (genetic). Physical appearance is without a doubt genetic. Intelligence does run in families, and in all animals, intelligence can be bred for. So intelligence must also be genetic in the same way physical strength is.

So it might someday be practical to select the very best traits from your own genetic line. Fertilize say 1000 of your own eggs, then genetically test them all and keep only the ones with the most desirable traits.  All your children would be physically strong, healthy, relatively intelligent to very intelligent. You could discard all of the embryos that have potentially violent, overly aggressive personalities, or who could overly passive and lazy. Transsexuals of course would be screened ou as just another defect. And homosexuals do not lead the best of lives on average, so we all know that most parents would screen out such future problems. Few parents want to think they will never have grand children.

Near perfect people, a better more peaceful world. Higher IQ's and far less in the way of medical or mental issues.

Can you say no to this future would? If so why would you stop science from improving the human race?

What are your thoughts?

Neanderthals were close cousin's to humans. More than just a little closely related, they basically looked like us with twice the muscle mass and slightly bigger brains. Physically they were a race of Arnold Schwarzeneggers. We have found some of their frozen bodies so this is not a guess. And it seems that many of us carry some of their genetics, so yes we cross bred with them. Despite their physical strength and large brains. Wherever modern man and neanderthal came in contact, neanderthal lost out. Our ancestors were the superior race so far as survival was concerned. While it seems they must have been very intelligent. They did make some cool tools. And when they came in contact with modern humans, their tools improved in quality. They learned from us in other words. I suppose we learned from them as well, but in the end, we lived and they died. Our genetics were better suited to survival than theirs were. Or we just cross bred them out of existence, maybe we where fast breeders?

And that is the way of evolution. The genetic line with superior (to survival) qualities out breeds and out survives the lessor genetic line. The superior race will live on, the inferior race dies out. Sometimes luck gets involved, being hit by a asteroid will wipe the earth of almost all life, no matter how well suited to survival it was. Such an event can make a subterranean anaerobic slime mold the earths strongest genetic line for a short time. But that is not something that has happened since mammals have dominated the earth.

To the point, different genetic lines have different qualities. If it is all random, with no guiding hand involved. Then anyone believing that evolution is all random (Darwin, Dawkins, etc) but denies the fact that humans living in differing isolated areas, will produce different human genetic lines. And that those isolated groups, would have some different genetic traits from other groups. With some of those traits imparting talents that make that race superior (or inferior) in different mental, as well as physical areas. To believe that, is to be lying to yourself.

But then again, if you really listen to the words of those who worship at the materialist alter. They so believe in being born mentally superior. Most of them are certain that they personalty carry these superior genetics. Oh but they will talk and write in circles, trying to say they believe evolution is the creator of all. That all mental abilities as well as physical are the results of your genetic line . . . But at this point they just shut up (in public). They do believe in racial superiority in traits such as intelligence, and or psychical abilities (are the dutch not a very tall people?). If they do not believe this, they do not believe all they say they do believe. This I doubt.

If you do not believe that unguided different genetic lines will have different physical trait and that the mental and physical are the same thing. Then you are denying what evolutionary biology teaches.

____________________

The Choices:

Creationist of the christian sort:  God made us all in his image we are all equal. 

Other religious explanations: From total race supremacists (other tribes are not even real people) to we are all bothers and sisters.

Deist: God made us but then let us go unadulterated by his hand. Might be a bit racist, or might not be racist at all.

Intelligent Design: God created life then guided evolution. It all depends on what you think of God the creator. Not racist at all, to very.

Random evolution did it all: You are ether racist or in denial.

So how racist are you?

I do not believe that, but I do see a lot of faiths and philosophies regularly ridiculed. Mormons and Catholics come to mind

My question is. What other religions and philosophies is it ok to ridicule?

Evangelicals?

Pagans?

Atheists?

Buddhists?

Muslims?

Hindus?

Vegans?  . . . . I like my Vegans roasted.

Read the US Constitution then tell me.

Can the Government make it a crime not the buy a Gun?

Is is constitutional to make it a crime if you do not own a car?

It is constitutional to make it a crime not to buy Medical insurance?

If one of these is constitutionally legal, but not all of them, tell me why?

And the Obama is very ignorant if he believes what he just said

Obama: "Supreme Court won’t overturn health care law"

Yes they are going to do just that and that is just a fact. The only question is what the 3 judges (maybe 4) on that court will say to justify ruling that the government has a right to make you buy something. Supposedly they must base their opinions on the US constitution and certainly they can not rule the opposite way the US Constitution reads. Saying that the provision of the health care law, that make it mandatory for an individual to buy health insurance from a private carrier, is legal under the US Constitution, is simply not possible. They will need to just make shit up.

The one good thing about the latest in anti black racist outrages.  There are no White people involved

Meet George Zimmerman the man who shot Trayvon Martin.

I have no idea what happened in this case. I learned long ago to never trust the first stories on these things, they almost always end up being bull shit. Here is the eyewitness account before this story went political.

Linked quote "And then, when I got upstairs and looked down, the guy who was on the top beating up the other guy, was the one laying in the grass, and I believe he was dead at that point."

But I wonder if this obviously Hispanic man had been named Carlos Rodríguez, would it be a national story?

Are you sitting comfortably? I find my self constantly drawn back to the subject of faith. Cited by many as the single most important influence on post modern micro eco compartmentalism, there are just not enough blues songs written about faith. Inevitably faith is often misunderstood by socialists, many of whom blame the influence of television. Complex though it is I shall now attempt to provide an exhaustive report on faith and its numerous 'industries'.

Social Factors

Comparisons between Roman Society and Medieval Society give a clear picture of the importance of faith to developments in social conduct. I will not insult the readers intelligence by explaining this obvious comparison any further. Back when Vealinger remarked ‘the power struggle will continue while the great tale of humanity remains untold’ [1] he must have been referring to faith. Both tyranny and democracy are tried and questioned. Yet faith irons out misconceptions from our consciousness.

Our post-literate society, more than ever before, relies upon faith. It has been said that the one thing in society which could survive a nuclear attack is faith. This is incorrect, actually cockroaches are the only thing which can survive a nuclear attack.

Economic Factors

We no longer live in a world which barters 'I'll give you three cows for that hat, it’s lovely.' Our existence is a generation which cries 'Hat - $20.' We shall examine the JTB-Guide-Dog model. Taking special care to highlight the role of faith within the vast framework which this provides.

The statistics make it clear that faith is a major market factor. In spite of the best efforts of The World Bank inflation cannot sustain this instability for long. A sharp down turn in middle class investment may lead to changes in the market.

Political Factors

Politics - smolitics! Looking at the spectrum represented by a single political party can be reminiscent of comparing night and day.

Consider this, spoken at the tender age of 14 by the uncompromising Achilles Rock 'consciousness complicates a myriad of progressions.' [2] One cannot help but agree when faced with faith, that this highlights an important issue. It would be wise to approach the subject with the thought that 'if you don't have anything nice to say, don't say anything at all'. However this can lead to missing out important facts.

I wait anxiously. What will the next few years bring for faith?

Conclusion

In conclusion, faith may not be the best thing since sliced bread, but it's still important. It sings a new song, it stimulates and it is human.

I will leave you with the words of Hollywood's Miles Cruise: 'I wouldn't be where I am today without faith.' [3]

[1] Vealinger - Turtle Power - 2003 ICJ

[2] Rock - Roll It Up - 1977 - F. Lower Publishing

[3] Weekly faith - Issue 54 - Rhino Media

Yes lots of words that say nothing intelligent at all. But they sound like they do and the person writing them might thing he is oh so bright. If that person in this case did not know they were intentionally writing crap

Did you read all of it?